-->
We are currently in a 40-days blog series about immigration. In light of the current U.S. Supreme Court battle over the Voting Rights Act--the highest court of the land just hear oral arguments on a big voting case yesterday--I felt like it was really important to write a blog on the topic. Here goes...
----------------------------------------
Latin@s and African Americans have historically experienced
wide-scale discrimination in voting.
This discrimination has taken the form of poll taxes, racial
gerrymandering, all white primaries, and prohibitions against interpreters at
the polls. Lest you think such
discrimination is an artifact of the distant past, as recently as August 28, 2012 (yes, just six months ago), the state
of Texas was found guilty of racial gerrymandering. Texas was found guilty of deliberately
drawing district boundaries in such a way as to weaken the voting power of democratic-leaning
Latinos, African Americans, and Asian Americans. In so doing, Texas violated Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In its comments upon the case, the
League of Women Voters denounced the Texas plan as “the most extreme example of
racial gerrymandering among all the redistricting proposals passed by lawmakers
so far this year.”
Just yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments
in a case which seeks to overturn—yes you guessed it—Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. According to Section 5, jurisdictions
with a history of constructing voting barriers against racial minorities need
federal authorization before they can implement certain voting changes. A state or local jurisdiction can get
off this “pre-clearance list” by demonstrating a 10-year clean record of no
racist violations in voting practices.
Guess which states are part of the racist voting list? Texas, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona,
Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and most of Virginia. I
can’t help but notice that many of these states have also recently passed some
of the most racist, anti-immigrant laws in the nation.
The current lawsuit before the Supreme Court was brought by
Shelby County, Alabama. Shelby County is still on “the list”
because it cannot demonstrate a clean record of 10 years. As an example, the city of Calera,
which is located within Shelby County was found guilty of redrawing its city
council districts in such a way as to prevent the reelection of the
municipality’s only black city council member. Latina Supreme
Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor—the first Latin@ member of the U.S. Supreme
Court—did not miss this irony. In yesterday’s hearing she said: "Some
parts of the South have changed. Your county pretty much hasn't," said
Sotomayor. "You may be the wrong party bringing this."
Opponents of Section 5 say that racism in voting is no
longer a big problem in the United States. Super conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has
even said that Section 5 results in the “perpetuation of a racial entitlement”—i.e.,
that it results in black and brown politicians and constituencies feeling
“entitled” to have voting districts which reflect their cultural communities. To that I say. Damn straight. We have been locked out of the
political structures of the U.S. for the past two hundred years because of
outright racism. This has resulted
in the creation of hundreds of laws and policies which have oppressed and
handicapped our communities—in law, education, healthcare, media, you name
it. We are just now starting to
gain political recognition and a meaningful hearing in the public square. And
now you want to tie our hands behind our back again? No way Scalia and Roberts. No way.
Racism is still alive and well. You may not see it, because it doesn’t affect you. Come to our communities. Come to our
homes. Come to our schools and
hospitals and cities. We are still
deeply impacted by decades of discrimination—past and present—and we need to be able to elect leaders who
understand how what we’ve been through still affects where we are today, and
leaders who understand our current realities. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is necessary to
preserve the small political voice we have recently gained, and to ensure that
our voice continues to be heard.
Let's pray for justice in the Supreme Court,
Let's pray for justice in the Supreme Court,
Robert Chao Romero
@ProfeChaoRomero
The best immigration lawyer for you is one who keeps up with this evolving field of law and how knows how best to use the law to protect you and your family and your business when it come to legal proceedings.
ReplyDeleteImmigration Attorneys London